Richard L. Duquette

3150 El Camino Real, Suite F
Carlsbad, California  92018
Phone 800.464.4123

Proving PI Case |  Defense Medical Exam |  The Door Zone | Joys of Cycling |  Proving MIST Causation |  Understanding Insurance company Claims procedures |  Deadlines on Filing Suit |  Speed Traps Illegal |  Trucker Tickets |  Helmet Law |  Beat Traffic tickets |  School Teacher Wins |  Government Claim Forms | 
Junk Science
 |  MIST | Maximizing your Net settlement |  Why I Love Helping Bicyclists |  Why Hire a Lawyer |  Prove Bike Case

"The Door Zone Debate":

I would like to comment on pending legislation affecting bicyclists. I was prompted by a helpful e-mail from Bill Nesper – League of American Bicyclists.

Specifically, Assembly bill (AB) 1408 has been authored to add Section 298 to the Vehicle Code (VC). This section would define a “Door Zone” as that section of the street adjacent to a parked vehicle that would be unsafe for use by vehicles or bicycles in motion, if one or more doors of the vehicle were opened.

Apparently the Vehicle Code is silent on this issue, and so is (VC) 21202 – which defines where cyclists should ride. Generally, its as far to the right of the road as safe, or in a posted bike lane.

Essentially, this door zone statute would broaden the legal zones to ride, i.e. when approaching parked cars – you can ride further into the road.

Practically, this may prove helpful if hit from an advancing motorist, because it would eliminate the insurance companies argument you were comparatively or totally at fault for riding wide.

Realistically, as we know, parked motorists inattentively fling open car doors, and often seriously injure cyclists. Since it’s hard to foresee this, the door zone statute would add more legal protection to cyclists.

Conversely, the insurance industry might argue that if you failed to ride wide (out of the door zone) you’re partially at fault since you had an “option”. So, I suggest further amending the legislation and closing this loophole. For example, add “However, riding in the door zone shall not be construed as assuming the risk of injury.” I’m sure we all agree cyclists have the right to assume the good conduct of parked motorists.

Let’s face it, when fighting for justice; legislation is a mighty sword when confronting the powerful insurance industry. I hope this debate raises the safety awareness level of motorists and cyclists.


This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice regarding their individual legal issues.