|
"THE DOOR ZONE DEBATE"
I
would like to comment on pending
legislation affecting bicyclists. I was
prompted by a helpful e-mail from Bill
Nesper – League
of American Bicyclists.
Specifically, Assembly bill (AB)
1408 has been authored to add
Section 298 to the Vehicle Code (VC).
This section would define a “Door
Zone” as that section of the
street adjacent to a parked vehicle that
would be unsafe for use by vehicles or
bicycles in motion, if one or more doors
of the vehicle were opened.
Apparently the Vehicle Code is
silent on this specific
definition, and so is
(VC) 21202 – which defines where
cyclists should ride. Generally, its as
far to the right of the road as safe, or
in a posted bike lane.
Essentially, this door zone
statute would broaden the legal zones to
ride, i.e. when approaching
parked cars – you can ride
further into
the road.
Practically, this may prove helpful if
hit from an advancing motorist, because
it would eliminate the
insurance companies argument you were comparatively
or totally at fault for riding
wide.
Realistically, as we know, parked
motorists inattentively fling open car
doors, and often seriously injure
cyclists. Since it’s hard to foresee
this, the door zone statute
would add more legal protection to
cyclists, than
California Vehicle Code § 22517
- which says:
No person shall open the
door of a vehicle on the side available
to moving traffic unless it is
reasonably safe to do so and can be done
without interfering with the movement of
such traffic, nor shall any person leave
a door open on the side of a vehicle
available to moving traffic for a period
of time longer than necessary to load or
unload passengers.
Conversely, the
insurance industry might argue that if
you failed to ride wide (out
of the door zone) you’re partially at
fault since you had an “option”. So, I
suggest further amending the
legislation and closing
this loophole. For example, add
“However, riding in the door zone shall
not be construed as assuming the risk of
injury.” I’m sure we all agree cyclists
have the right to assume the good
conduct of parked motorists.
Let’s face it, when fighting for
justice; legislation is a mighty sword
when confronting the powerful insurance
industry. I hope this debate raises the
safety awareness level of motorists and
cyclists.
|