Maximizing Your Net Settlement
by Reducing Medical Liens:
There
are several ways to maximize your bicycle injury settlement.
Let’s talk about a couple.
A current hot legal issue is whether you have to repay your
health care insurance company from your settlement proceeds.
The health care companies assert they have a contractual right to
recovery in their plan. They want any medical bills they paid
reimbursed. It seems odd the insured (you) has to repay his
insurance company. After all, you loyally paid premiums for
coverage and would expect to receive a benefit in exchange for the
premiums you paid. That’s why your paid premiums in the first
place. Reimbursement is not fair, because this will reduce your net
settlement. A recent case entitled Shereboff v. Mid-Atlantic
Medical Services, Inc. (2006) 126 S. Ct. 1869 has discussed
this issue and the interplay between consumer friendly Federal
Erisa legislation that historically exempted repayment.
The US Supreme Court has held that an Erisa plan can seek
reimbursement from the insured’s settlement of a lawsuit,
provided it can place a lien on an “identifiable
account”.
More specifically, the lien recovery companies will argue that if
the injury victim or his lawyer is in possession and control of
settlement funds when the lien is asserted then there is an asset
to enforce an equitable right of reimbursement. So, timing and
distribution of your settlement, as well as a lien
reduction, are factors to consider with your experienced trial
lawyer.
Having an experienced trial attorney can often help you
negotiate a lien reduction based on the attorney’s
rate of recovery. This savings (i.e. a 33% reduction) can be passed
on to the injured client.
There’s also another lien reduction theory, called the
“made whole” doctrine. If the injured party is
not made whole due to low insurance policy limits by the wrong
doer, it can be argued the victim should not have to reimburse
settlement funds to the health insurance company. This would be
inequitable. So, a “waiver” of repayment may be in
order. (Should you have a “medical payment” coverage
provision on your auto policy – these same negotiation
strategies may apply).
A second form of attack on your settlement can come from a statute
called Civil Code section 3045 et al. This allows a medical
provider like a hospital (as opposed to a health care insurance
company) to recover up to half of your recovery. I always argue
their recovery begins after attorney fees and litigation costs are
paid. This protects your settlement fund. (Where as, uninsured
– underinsured motorist cases can be totally exempt from
repayment, it depends on the insurance contract.)
In conclusion - learning how to identify the type of lien asserted
and negotiate around different types of liens requires an
experienced lawyer who has studied this complex ever changing area
of law.
Since 1983 I have watched this area of law evolve. Knowing the lien
laws nuances’ has helped save clients thousands of
dollars.
I take pride in maximizing your net settlement recovery by
working out a reasonable settlement strategy for you and or your
loved ones.
Ride safe, ride strong.
This web site is
designed for general information only. The information presented at
this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the
formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this
site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice
regarding their individual legal issues.
|