helmet
laW
On May 25, 1995 San Diego
Federal Court Judge Napoleon Jones had the courage to permanently
enjoin (restrict) the California Highway Patrol from enforcing the
helmet law (CVC 27803) in California. Easy Riders Freedom v.
Hannigan (1995)m 93-0807-J.
The police are now prohibited
from:
Stopping and issuing a ticket to a cyclist wearing a helmet,
unless certain criteria are met. The police can't stop
you arbitrarily. The officer must have reasonable
suspicion to believe that the helmet was not certified
or the cyclist had actual knowledge the helmet failed to
meet Federal standards. The officer will not meet this standard
if he is unable to observe your helmet due to distance, speed or
other cars blocking his view.
Another hurdle exists if you exercise your 5th amendment right
to remain silent when he questions you about the helmet.
Also, object (do not consent) to the search of the inside
of the helmet, i.e. when he asks you to take it off.
Unless he has reasonable suspicion or you are under arrest,
a 4th Amendment illegal search of the helmet and seizure of it and
you should win your case at trial.
Moreover, the police can't cite (arrest) you unless he has
probable cause to believe the helmet was not manufactured
certified when sold, or was certified when sold but not by
Federal standards and you knew it. Again, the above suggestions and
objections will help you.
Make sure when you do sign the ticket, that you write on it
"over objection" and ask the officer to write on the back of
his ticket your 4th and 5th Amendment objection. This will help
you in court. Save your struggle for court, so as to
avoid a PC 148 - Obstructing or delaying an officer
charge.
So after you're cited for a helmet law violation, demand a court
trial. If the officer fails to appear, make a motion to
dismiss the case for a lack of prosecution. If the officer does
show, at the end of his testimony make a motion to suppress
evidence due to an illegal search and seizure under the 4th
Amendment. (A motion is a written or oral request
to the Judge). A motion allows you to take the offensive and forces
the State to justify their behavior.
The reason the 4th Amendment was violated was because the
officer stopped you on a hunch or merely subjective suspicion. The
officer failed to state specific and objective reasons why he
stopped you, per the guidelines set forth in the above
case.
In a recent trial, a California Highway Patrol officer's reasons
for detention of a cyclist were made to look ridicules because he
detained the cyclist even though he was too far away and going too
fast to have made the alleged observations of an illegal helmet
from across several lanes of freeway traffic.
This web site is
designed for general information only. The information presented at
this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the
formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this
site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice
regarding their individual legal issues.
|